Experimental study demonstrates concurrent topology and printing orientation optimisation enhances concrete load capacity, indicating a viable route for strength-aware structural fabrication.
The layer-wise deposition process of three-dimensional concrete printing (3DPC) induces anisotropic behaviour, while cementitious materials exhibit pronounced tension–compression strength asymmetry. This study develops a concurrent topology and printing-direction optimisation framework for plain 3DPC under Drucker–Prager (D–P) strength constraints. Within a solid isotropic material with penalisation (SIMP) formulation, material density and printing orientation are updated simultaneously using the Method of Moving Asymptotes (MMA). A double-angle vector-field mapping regularises the π-periodic orientation field, while element-wise D–P failure indices are aggregated into a differentiable global constraint through P-norm aggregation with adaptive scale correction. Numerical studies on a four-corner pinned plate, a T-shaped bracket and a perforated deep beam show that the strength constraint reshapes load paths, suppresses local strength violations and increases ultimate load capacity by approximately 200%, 176% and 42%, respectively, relative to compliance-based optimisation. The optimised deep-beam layouts are reconstructed, converted into continuous printing paths, fabricated and tested under three-point bending. Experimentally, the mean ultimate load increases from 8.13 to 9.54 kN, corresponding to an increase of 17.39%, while the mean displacement at peak load and pre-peak energy are 20.58% and 41.16% higher, respectively. The experimental and finite element comparisons show closely similar ultimate-load increases of 17.39% and 17.43%, respectively. The framework provides a strength-aware route from concurrent numerical optimisation to the fabrication and structural assessment of plain 3DPC components.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: