Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical framework evaluates psychological need regulation in digital environments, suggesting implications for user interaction and well-being.
The pervasive diffusion of digital technologies has transformed not only communication practices, but also the processes through which fundamental psychological needs are activated, regulated, and satisfied. This work introduces the Digital Needs Shift (DNS), a theoretical framework that describes how stable psychological needs, such as attachment, belonging, recognition, and identity, are increasingly mediated within digitally structured environments. Moving beyond usage-based approaches to digital well-being, the model conceptualizes digital distress as a structurally mediated outcome emerging from the misalignment between human motivational systems and the operational logics of digital platforms. The Digital Needs Shift is conceptualized as a recursive process in which need activation leads to digital interaction, producing rapid but partial forms of gratification that fail to fully resolve the underlying need. This generates persistent activation and repeated engagement, reinforced by mechanisms such as intermittent reinforcement, availability cues, social comparison, and identity fragmentation. By integrating classical psychological theories with research on computer-mediated communication, this framework provides a process-based account of need regulation in digital environments. The work also advances a set of testable theoretical propositions and outlines directions for future empirical research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beatrice Chiavaroli (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: