Retrospective cohort study evaluates invasive fungal infections affecting graft outcomes in intestine transplant recipients, suggesting urgent management is critical.
BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) represent a major complication after intestine transplantation, with reported incidence rates between 40% and 49%. These infections are associated with high morbidity and allograft loss. This study evaluates the impact of post-transplant IFIs on graft outcomes in intestine transplant recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 152 patients who underwent intestine transplantation from 2008 to 2022. The primary outcome was IFI, defined as proven or probable by EORTC/MSGERC criteria. The secondary outcome was a composite of allograft failure or death. Analyses were conducted using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with non-baseline variables incorporated as time-dependent exposures. RESULTS: Among 152 intestine transplant recipients, 56 (36.8%) developed post-transplant IFI. Median time to IFI was 83.5 days (IQR 19.5-444.2), with Candida infections occurring early and non-Candida infections occurring later. Candida species accounted for 73% of IFIs, most commonly C. glabrata, C. albicans, and C. parapsilosis, with 29.3% showing fluconazole resistance. Most infections were intra-abdominal and bloodstream. Redo transplantation (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.20-4.95; p = 0.014), anastomotic leak (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.02-4.90; p = 0.045), and augmented immunosuppression (HR 4.73, 95% CI 1.94-11.53; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of Candida IFI. IFI was associated with a markedly increased risk of allograft loss or death (HR 3.67, 95% CI 2.30-5.83; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplant IFIs are common and associated with allograft loss or mortality in intestine transplant recipients. Early recognition and aggressive management of IFIs remain critical to improving transplant outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alabdely et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: