Why the study?
Does intravenous cangrelor reduce the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization compared to oral clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI?
Population
n=8,877 patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, international…
Comparison
Cangrelor administered intravenously 30 minutes… vs Oral loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel…
Design
RCT
Follow-up
48 hours
Authors
Loading...
Cangrelor confers no ischemic benefit over clopidogrel at 48 hours; confirms oral loading suffices as standard in ACS PCI.
Does intravenous cangrelor reduce the composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization compared to oral clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI?
Intravenous cangrelor was not superior to an oral loading dose of 600 mg of clopidogrel in reducing ischemic events at 48 hours in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing PCI.
Harrington et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: