Why the study?
Use of cardioneuroablation has risen, but proper patient selection and technique are prerequisites for safe and effective use, warranting a review of available evidence.
What is the current scientific evidence and summary position on cardioneuroablation for reflex syncope and functional bradyarrhythmias?
What is the current scientific evidence and summary position on cardioneuroablation for reflex syncope and functional bradyarrhythmias?
This scientific statement provides a consensus position on the use of cardioneuroablation as an alternative to cardiac pacing for selected patients with reflex syncope and functional bradyarrhythmias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Offers consensus guidance for cardioneuroablation in selected reflex syncope; extends evidence synthesis for this pacing alternative.
Cardioneuroablation has emerged as a potential alternative to cardiac pacing in selected cases with vasovagal reflex syncope, extrinsic vagally induced sinus bradycardia-arrest or atrioventricular block. The technique was first introduced decades ago, and its use has risen over the past decade. However, as with any intervention, proper patient selection and technique are a prerequisite for a safe and effective use of cardioneuroablation therapy. This document aims to review and interpret available scientific evidence and provide a summary position on the topic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aksu et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: