Randomized trial compares transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation and sham treatment for bladder discomfort, suggesting a non-invasive alternative to current methods.
Catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD), characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, and suprapubic pain, is a clinically significant complication following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Current CRBD pharmacotherapy faces inherent limitations due to adverse effect profiles. Transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), a noninvasive neuromodulation therapy with demonstrated efficacy in bladder dysfunction management, shows particular promise as a safe and effective alternative for CRBD treatment. This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled patients undergoing TURP under general anesthesia. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either active TTNS intervention or sham stimulation. The primary outcome focused on CRBD-related discomfort severity assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) immediately post-intervention. Secondary outcomes comprised CRBD severity and pain scores at 1-, 2-, and 6-h post-intervention intervals, analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction ratings, and occurrence of postoperative delirium. This protocol evaluates the therapeutic potential of TTNS for CRBD following TURP, exploring its viability as a non-invasive alternative to current CRBD management. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2400088488. Registered on 20th August 2024.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: