Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose: To externally evaluate a mammography-based deep learning (DL) model (Mirai) in a high-risk racially diverse population and compare its performance with other mammographic measures. Materials and Methods: A total of 6435 screening mammograms in 2096 female patients (median age, 56.4 years ± 11.2 [SD]) enrolled in a hospital-based case-control study from 2006 to 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Pathologically confirmed breast cancer was the primary outcome. Mirai scores were the primary predictors. Breast density and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment categories were comparative predictors. Performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and concordance index analyses. Results: < .001 at all time points), suggesting that its predictions are likely dependent on the detection of ipsilateral premalignant patterns. Conclusion: .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omoleye et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: