Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: There is a scarcity of US data about the epidemiology of ischemic stroke etiologies. The stroke etiology data field in the Get-with-the-Guidelines (GWTG) Stroke Registry has a 43% missing rate. We sought to develop a scalable machine-learning model to predict ischemic stroke etiology using variables already collected in the GWTG Stroke registry. Methods: We linked data from two GWTG Stroke registries from YNHH and MGH from 2015-2020 with non-missing, non-cryptogenic stroke etiology inputs adjudicated by the agreement of at least 2 board-certified vascular neurologists’ review of the EHR data from the acute ischemic stroke hospitalization. We trained machine-learning classifiers using XGBoost to predict non-cryptogenic stroke etiology per 4-level TOAST classification using sequentially increasing number of features along with imputation of missing values: (1) Model-1 with age and sex, (2) Model-2 with all GWTG variables excluding ICD codes, and (3) Model-3 with all GWTG variables including ICD codes. Each model underwent Bayesian hyperparameter optimization with 1,000 trials and 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated by the following metrics: AUCROC, accuracy, and Cohen’s kappa. Results: The cohort included 2,724 patients (median age 70; males = 53%). The number of features was 80 in Model 2 and 2,733 in Model 3. In Model-1, the cross-validation mean AUCROC was 0.64, accuracy 0.45, F1 0.30, and kappa 0.063. Model-2's mean AUCROC was 0.78, accuracy 0.57, F1 0.56, and kappa 0.36. Model-3's mean AUCROC was 0.83, accuracy 0.62, F1 0.62, and kappa 0.44. The performance of the three models with respect to diagnosing each etiology is presented in Figure 1 . Conclusion: We developed and validated a proof-of-concept machine-learning model built using variables available in the GWTG Stroke Registry including embedded ICD codes that yield a predicted ischemic stroke etiology in moderate agreement with board-certified vascular neurologists. Upon further improvement, its application to the National GWTG Stroke Registry could allow automatic population of the stroke etiology variable and facilitate etiologic-specific quality evaluation and epidemiologic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: