Why the study?
Does intravascular ultrasound predict fractional flow reserve <0.75 in patients with an angiographically ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis?
Does intravascular ultrasound predict fractional flow reserve <0.75 in patients with an angiographically ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis?
IVUS-derived minimum lumen diameter of 2.8 mm and minimum lumen area of 5.9 mm2 are highly accurate in predicting the physiological significance of ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis.
May inform LM revascularization decisions in ambiguous cases; leaves open prospective outcome validation.
BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is being used to assess the significance of a left main coronary artery stenosis (LMCS). However, the cutoff values of IVUS parameters at which to predict a fractional flow reserve (FFR) of 0.75 are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 55 patients with an angiographically ambiguous LMCS, a pressure guidewire was used to calculate FFR, and IVUS parameters were calculated after automatic pullback. FFR averaged 0.86+/-0.13 (range, 0.55 to 1.0). IVUS minimum lumen diameter (MLD), minimum lumen area (MLA), cross-sectional narrowing (CSN), and area stenosis (AS) were 3.8+/-0.61 mm, 7.65+/-2.9 mm2, 59+/-13%, and 47+/-19%, respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated strong correlations between FFR and MLD (r=0.79, P<0.0001) as well as between FFR and MLA (r=0.74, P<0.0001). There were inverse, moderate correlations between FFR and CSN (r=0.69, P<0.0001), followed by those between FFR and AS (r=0.54, P<0.0001). Compared with FFR as the "gold standard," an MLD of 2.8 mm had the highest sensitivity and specificity (93% and 98%, respectively) for determining the significance of an LMCS, followed by an MLA of 5.9 mm2 (93% and 95%, respectively). Based on an FFR <0.75 and an FFR > or =0.75, the 38-month survival and event-free survival estimates (EFSEs) were both 100% and 100% versus 90%, respectively (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that (1) an IVUS MLD and MLA of 2.8 mm and 5.9 mm2, respectively, strongly predict the physiological significance of an LMCS and (2) among patients with an LMCS, an FFR of 0.75 is a strong predictor of survival and EFSE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jasti et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: