Why the study?
Standard fluoroscopy-guided His bundle pacing can be challenging and fluoro-consuming, but targeting the His bundle guided exclusively by electrical signals could enable precise lead placement while reducing fluoroscopy time and radiation dose.
Is electrogram-guided His bundle pacing with minimal or no fluoroscopy feasible and safe in patients requiring pacing?
Is electrogram-guided His bundle pacing with minimal or no fluoroscopy feasible and safe in patients requiring pacing?
Electrogram-guided His bundle pacing is highly feasible and safe, allowing for successful lead placement with minimal or no fluoroscopy in the majority of patients.
Electrogram-guided HBP with minimal fluoroscopy appears feasible in select cases; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before wider adoption.
INTRODUCTION: His bundle pacing (HBP) is the most physiological pacing. The standard technique based on fluoroscopic approach might be challenging and fluoro consuming. Targeting the His guided exclusively by the electrical signals could enable a precise lead implant, thus reducing fluoroscopy time (FT) and X-ray dose, desirable both for patients and operators. The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety both acutely and at 30 days of the electrogram (EGM)-guided HBP with minimal or no fluoroscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October and December 2018, 41 consecutive patients underwent EGM-guided HBP. Successful HBP was obtained in 39 (95%) patients, (30 males, 78 ± 10 years). Selective HBP (S-HBP) was achieved in 23 (59%), nonselective HBP (NS-HBP) in 16 (41%) patients. The final HBP lead position was reached in 31 (79.4%) patients without fluoroscopy, only guided by electrical signals. In eight patients a minimal fluoroscopy (mean, 8 seconds) has been required. The sheath's cutting and the slack of the lead were routinely performed under fluoroscopy. No difference was observed in FT for HBP lead placement in S-HBP and NS-HBP (mean, 8.1 ± 25 vs 7.5 ± 20 seconds, P = .8; median value 0 vs 0 seconds). No differences were observed in FT for the entire procedure, total dose area product and total procedural time in S-HBP and NS-HBP. Lead dislodgement occurred in one (2.6%) patient 1 day after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: HBP could be performed safely and efficiently using the EGMs, with minimal or no fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy was required during sheath removal and atrial lead placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zanon et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: