Why the study?
Does biomarker-guided care using natriuretic peptides improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does biomarker-guided care using natriuretic peptides improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Natriuretic peptides offer a potential objective biomarker-guided approach to optimize therapy and monitor disease status in chronic heart failure, addressing existing treatment gaps.
Does not support routine natriuretic peptide-guided therapy in chronic heart failure; leaves open the need for definitive outcome trials.
The current standard treatment of chronic heart failure (HF) is based on clinical judgment, with the goal of achieving the maximally tolerated therapeutic program. The complexity of this approach may contribute to the well-established treatment gaps that exist in HF management; consequently, the risks for morbidity and mortality in this population remain extremely high. Alternative means are needed to improve the outcomes of patients with HF. Natriuretic peptides are biological markers for HF disease--its presence, severity, and prognosis--and show unique interactions with therapeutics known to have benefit in HF. Accordingly, interest has recently developed in "biomarker-guided" care for HF. This approach involves applying these assays to identify patients in need of therapy intensification and to provide an objective "monitor" of disease status. This review examines the biology of natriuretic peptides, discusses the rationale for their use in HF, and details the aggregate experience gained thus far in biomarker-guided care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Motiwala et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: