Why the study?
Evidence remains limited regarding paclitaxel-coated balloons in bifurcation and large vessel de novo lesions, and long-term outcome studies of sirolimus-coated balloons remain limited.
What is the current preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and device design of drug-coated balloons in percutaneous coronary interventions?
What is the current preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and device design of drug-coated balloons in percutaneous coronary interventions?
This review highlights that drug-coated balloons are an effective, scaffold-free alternative to drug-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease, though further research is needed for broader indications and long-term outcomes.
Percutaneous coronary intervention has evolved significantly due to advancements in interventional strategies and device technologies. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) have emerged as drug delivery devices that don’t use a metallic scaffold, delivering antiproliferative drugs directly to the arterial wall. Paclitaxel-coated balloons have demonstrated efficacy in treating in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease; however, there is still limited evidence regarding their efficacy and safety in treating bifurcation and large vessel de novo lesions. Sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) have shown promising outcomes in preclinical studies, exhibiting reduced smooth muscle cell loss and lower downstream embolisation. SCBs have demonstrated efficacy in treating in-stent restenosis and small vessel disease in clinical trials, but long-term outcome studies remain limited. This review explores preclinical and clinical data on DCBs, highlighting the vascular response, pharmacokinetics, and comparison of effectiveness between paclitaxel-coated balloons and SCBs. Furthermore, novel technologies, including everolimus and dual-drug formulations, are being investigated to enhance therapeutic outcomes. While DCBs provide a viable alternative to drug-eluting stents for specific indications, further research is needed to establish optimal patient selection, refine drug delivery mechanisms, and evaluate long-term outcomes. The evolution of DCBs continues to shape future percutaneous coronary intervention strategies, potentially offering a scaffold-free approach with equivalent or improved clinical outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: