Why the study?
The diagnosis and specific and causal treatment of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy remain a major clinical challenge.
This review highlights the ongoing importance of endomyocardial biopsy as the gold standard for diagnosing myocarditis and discusses future precision medicine approaches using advanced molecular diagnostics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Endomyocardial biopsy remains the diagnostic standard for myocarditis; leaves open integration of molecular precision approaches pending prospective validation.
The diagnosis and specific and causal treatment of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathy remain a major clinical challenge. Despite the rapid development of new imaging techniques, endomyocardial biopsies remain the gold standard for accurate diagnosis of inflammatory myocardial disease. With the introduction and continued development of immunohistochemical inflammation diagnostics in combination with viral nucleic acid testing, myocarditis diagnostics have improved significantly since their introduction. Together with new technologies such as miRNA and gene expression profiling, quantification of specific immune cell markers, and determination of viral activity, diagnostic accuracy and patient prognosis will continue to improve in the future. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the pathogenesis and diagnosis of myocarditis and inflammatory cardiomyopathies and highlight future perspectives for more in-depth and specialized biopsy diagnostics and precision, personalized medicine approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baumeier et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: