Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the geometric origin of mock modular forms, suggesting unified mathematical structures.
This paper proves that the entire mathematical structure of mock modular forms—including Zwegers' non-holomorphic completion, the holomorphic shadow, the Bruinier–Funke exact sequence, and the arithmetic of their Fourier coefficients—has a single, unified geometric origin: the Z₂ involution σ² = id on a torus orbifold T²/Z₂. We establish the Twisted Torus Theorem, demonstrating that the mock modular decomposition of a harmonic Maass form into holomorphic and non-holomorphic parts is identically the Z₂ eigenspace decomposition of the orbifold's state space. We construct an explicit isomorphism proving that the Bruinier–Funke differential ξₖ is the analytic realisation of the Tate cohomology differential D = 1 - σ, establishing that BRST nilpotency descends directly from the geometric identity D ∘ N = 0. Furthermore, we identify the non-holomorphic Zwegers shadow with the twisted de Rham cohomology of the flat Z₂ local system over the orbifold. Arithmetically, we rigorously prove that the geometric Z₂ projection operator acts as the exact analytic multiplier (1 - 2⁻ˢ) on the $p = 2$ Euler factor of the divisor Dirichlet series, completely preserving multiplicativity over all odd primes. This pure mathematical unification resolves the geometric meaning of mock modularity, answering Ramanujan's century-old intuition: an interacting mock modular form is simply a free modular form defined on a space that has been folded in half.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhiren Jashwant MASTER (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: