Key result
AMS-led reviews are associated with ~56% less antiplatelet use and increased PPI prescribing in DOAC patients.
Why the study?
Co-prescribing antiplatelets with long-term anticoagulation increases bleeding risk, prompting this study to assess the impact of an anticoagulation management service-led intervention on reducing unnecessary antiplatelets and increasing gastrointestinal prophylaxis.
Does an anticoagulation management service (AMS)-led annual review reduce unnecessary antiplatelet use and increase PPI prescribing in adults on long-term DOAC therapy?
Cohort (n=8,462)
Does an anticoagulation management service (AMS)-led annual review reduce unnecessary antiplatelet use and increase PPI prescribing in adults on long-term DOAC therapy?
A centralized anticoagulation management service significantly improves guideline-directed antithrombotic therapy by reducing inappropriate antiplatelet co-prescription and increasing gastrointestinal bleeding prophylaxis in patients on DOACs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AMS associated with reduced antiplatelet use; leaves open net clinical benefit pending randomized trials in DOAC patients.
Patients on long-term anticoagulation face increased bleeding risk when antiplatelets are co-prescribed, especially upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Guidelines recommend limiting antiplatelet use to highly select patients on background anticoagulants and promoting GI prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for those requiring dual antithrombotic therapy. To assess the impact of an anticoagulation management service (AMS)-led intervention on reducing excess antiplatelet use and increasing PPI prescribing in patients who require continued antiplatelet therapy. This study of retrospective chart review included adults (≥ 18 years) on long-term direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy from October 2023 to September 2024. The intervention group included AMS-enrolled patients who received structured annual anticoagulation review. The control group consisted of DOAC patients receiving usual care outside AMS. The AMS annual review aims to optimize antithrombotic therapy by deprescribing unnecessary antiplatelets and initiating PPIs when clinically indicated. Of 8,462 eligible patients, 3,125 were in the AMS group and 5,337 in the non-AMS group. Antiplatelet use was significantly lower in AMS patients at baseline (9% vs. 15%) and study end (7% vs. 16%) (p < 0.0001). PPI use was significantly higher in AMS patients at both time points (50% vs. 30% for baseline, 67% vs. 38% at the end of study) (p < 0.0001). Acceptance rates for AMS recommendations were 18.8% for antiplatelet discontinuation and 33% for PPI initiation. AMS-led interventions effectively reduced concurrent antiplatelet use in patients on background DOAC and increased PPI prescribing in those on dual therapy, demonstrating the value of centralized anticoagulation services in primary care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoang et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Long-term direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy (n=8,462). Anticoagulation management service (AMS)-led annual review vs. Usual care outside AMS was evaluated on Antiplatelet use at study end (p=<0.0001). An anticoagulation management service-led annual review reduced concurrent antiplatelet use and increased PPI prescribing in patients on background DOACs.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: