Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Post-hoc analysis identifies predictors of relapse in CIDP patients undergoing SCIG treatment, suggesting the need for careful dosage evaluation.
BACKGROUND: In a previous study we demonstrated that standardized tapering off subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is a safe way to identify remission in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, clinical characteristics and dosage of SCIG in patients in remission are unknown. METHODS: week, pending no deterioration occurred. All patients were followed for 164 weeks after inclusion and were evaluated with disability scores, quality of life score (EQ-5D-5L), blood samples and clinical examination. RESULTS: Receiving a dosage of SCIG >25 g/week predicts a higher risk of relapse, OR 6.3 (95CI 1.8-20.2)(p = 0.004), but not when considering body weight (SCIG >0.3 g/kg/week), OR 3.3 (95CI 1.0-9.7)(p = 0.05). Moreover, a higher level of serum NfL OR 8.2 (95CI 1.1-93.3)(p = 0.04) predicts relapse. Low scores on EQ-5D-5L at baseline predicted increased risk of relapse. Serum calprotectin was similar in patients with relapse and in remission. Evaluating measurements from baseline, final visit and the last visit before final visit (LVBF), we found that deterioration in clinical performance could not be predicted at LVBF based on any of the tests performed. CONCLUSION: Patients experiencing a relapse of CIDP during tapering off SCIG seem to receive a total higher dosage of immunoglobulin and had a higher sNfL prior to tapering off compared to patients without a relapse.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markvardsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: