Proposes a modular architecture for flexible multiplex staining, integrating fluidic processing and sensing mechanisms.
Automated multiplex immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) require staining platforms that combine stable reagent exchange, low-volume operation, process observability, and protocol flexibility. Existing autostainers are often rigid and costly, whereas microfluidic and sensing solutions remain largely component-specific rather than system-oriented. This study proposes and partially validates a layered cyber-physical architecture for multiplex histological staining. The architecture integrates five functional layers—biochemical workflow, fluidic processing, capacitive sensing, protocol-driven control, and software-based process representation—within a unified formal framework and is supported at the subsystem level by experimental characterization of its fluidic and sensing layers. Fluidic experiments on a slot-type microfluidic chamber identified a practical operating window in which upper-feed operation, moderate calibrated flow conditions, and low chamber angles between 10° and 40° provide stable filling and acceptable drainage. The differential slot-line capacitive sensing subsystem detected liquid volumes as low as 0.5 µL, with stable threshold-based interpretation at a practical detection threshold of approximately 5 fF after digital filtering. The control and software layers are specified at the architectural and formal model level; their hardware implementation and closed-loop validation remain subjects of future work. Together, the reported results demonstrate that controlled reagent transport and sensing-based process observability are jointly feasible within the proposed modular framework, establishing a conceptual and experimental foundation for scalable, flexible, and resource-efficient multiplex IHC/ISH systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kabashkin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: