Intermodal container terminals play a critical role in modern logistics systems, where operational efficiency and energy consumption are strongly influenced by container stacking strategies. Inefficient yard organization leads to increased reshuffling operations, which negatively affect handling time and resource utilization. Despite extensive research, the relationship between operational performance and energy consumption remains insufficiently explored under dynamic terminal conditions. This study applies a discrete-event simulation framework to evaluate the impact of alternative container stacking strategies on both operational efficiency and energy consumption. The model represents container arrivals, storage decisions, retrieval processes, and reshuffling operations over a multi-day simulation horizon. Three stacking strategies—FIFO, balanced distribution, and departure-time clustering—are analysed under identical and dynamically evolving conditions using performance indicators related to reshuffling intensity, handling efficiency, and energy consumption. The results show that stacking strategies significantly affect terminal performance, but their effectiveness depends on the structure of container flows. While FIFO achieves the lowest reshuffling intensity and energy consumption under high-load conditions, departure-time clustering improves performance in outbound-dominated scenarios. The findings also reveal a structural discrepancy between operational and energy-related performance, as non-productive movements account for a higher share of operations than of total energy consumption. The study demonstrates that container stacking should be treated as a multi-criteria decision problem, where minimizing reshuffles does not directly correspond to minimizing energy consumption. The proposed simulation-based framework provides a consistent environment for evaluating trade-offs between operational and energy-related performance under controlled dynamic conditions.
Mateusz Zając (Tue,) studied this question.