Qualitative study explores key facilitators and barriers in stepparent–adolescent interactions, highlighting implications for support.
Stepfamily formation involving adolescents presents unique challenges and opportunities, yet factors that shape stepparent–adolescent interaction remain under-explored. This study explored factors that facilitate or obstruct stepparent–adolescent interaction of any kind. Using maximum variation purposive sampling, we conducted in-depth interviews with 18 U.S. emerging adults (ages 18–23) who had lived with a stepparent from age 10 onward. Transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Adapting the COM-B (capability, opportunity, motivation—behavior) model as a framework, 11 themes were developed: under capability—individual traits (with three subthemes), stepparent allegiance or deference to the resident parent, adolescent loyalty binds, relational ambiguity, and assumed roles and imposed expectations; under opportunity—external social facilitation (with three subthemes), stepparent compensatory and value-add functions, physical proximity and household composition, and shared family labor; and under motivation—adolescent interest in relationship development and stepparent proaction. Findings showcase stepparent–adolescent interaction as an emergent systemic property shaped by intrapersonal, dyadic, household, and broader social factors. The COM-B framework offers professionals a structured approach to assess stepparent–adolescent interactional capability, opportunity, and motivation when supporting stepfamilies. Future research should employ prospective, multi-informant designs to further substantiate identified factors and guide the development of measures for practice and research applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jensen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: