Why the study?
Does local anaesthesia provide successful outcomes compared to general or regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?
Does local anaesthesia provide successful outcomes compared to general or regional anaesthesia in patients undergoing endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms?
This review highlights the growing evidence and feasibility of using local anaesthesia for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, potentially shifting the paradigm from general or regional anaesthesia.
Supports local anaesthesia feasibility for selected EVAR; leaves open need for randomized comparisons to general or regional anaesthesia.
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been the main treatment approach for the last two decades. Its outcomes have been reported to be satisfactory over such period and provided a lower morbidity and mortality rates when compared to the conventional open repairs. With time, the initial use of general anaesthetics has been replaced with regional anaesthesia and lately, the utilization of local anaesthesia (LA) for stenting the abdominal aortic aneurysms have been practiced in several centres internationally with excellent outcomes in selected cohorts. The key success in using LA is the advancement in the access techniques and less requirement for conventional open method to advance and deploy the stents through the femoral artery. This literature review aims at examining the current evidences behind the success of LA and whether it is going to be the new wide spread and standard method for anaesthesia in elective or emergency cases of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harky et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: