Analyzes seronegative rheumatoid arthritis outcomes in a Japanese cohort, indicating distinct management needs.
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: To investigate longitudinal trends in the proportion of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to compare clinical outcomes between seronegative and seropositive patients in a Japanese single-centre cohort. METHOD: We included 4,354 RA patients with a disease duration < 4 years from the Institute of Rheumatology, Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort. Seronegativity was defined as the absence of both rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody. We assessed the association between enrolment period and seronegativity using multivariable logistic regression. A mixed-effects model was used to compare 3-year trends in Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and the Japanese version of the Health Assessment Questionnaire (J-HAQ) scores between serostatus groups. RESULTS: The proportion of seronegative RA increased from 14.4% in 2000-2010 to 17.9% in 2011-2021. The later period was associated with seronegativity (adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.32 [1.08-1.61]), negative RF (1.23 [1.05-1.45]), and negative anti-CCP antibody (1.31 [1.11-1.56]). At 3 years, seronegative patients had better mean (95% confidence interval) CDAI (4.50 [3.48-5.53] vs. 5.57 [4.66-6.48]), DAS28-ESR (2.13 [1.93-2.32] vs. 2.54 [2.37-2.71]), and J-HAQ (0.43 [0.33-0.54] vs. 0.52 [0.42-0.61]) compared with seropositive patients. The proportions of patients achieving J-HAQ remission were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of seronegative RA has increased significantly over time. Seronegative patients demonstrate a favourable disease course with a higher rate of remission compared with seropositive patients, thus identifying them as a distinct RA subgroup. Key Points • The proportion of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis increased over time in a large Japanese cohort. • Patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis had significantly higher rates of clinical remission over 3 years. • The increasing proportion and distinct prognosis of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis may require specific management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Higuchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: