Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares disease severity in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, suggesting aggressive potential in both conditions.
Objectives: Our study aimed to compare patients with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (SNRA) and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (SPRA) to determine whether they represent favourable and unfavourable subtypes of the same disease, or whether SNRA patients follow an aggressive course similar to SPRA patients. Methods: Results: Gender, age at diagnosis, comorbidities, acute phase reactants, medical therapies (excluding leflunomide), anaemia, cancer, and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). There was also no significant difference between the groups in the total number of joints where erosion was detected (SNRA: n=9 (8.3%), SPRA: n=25 (11.1%), P=0.563). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was the most common extra-articular involvement and was detected only in the SPRA group (n=9 (4.0%), P=0.034). Conclusions: It should be noted that SNRA patients, like SPRA patients, may experience an aggressive disease course and develop erosive joint damage. Seropositivity is important regarding ILD, and necessary follow-up and treatment plans should be implemented without delay for both SNRA and SPRA patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mısırcı et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: