Randomized trial develops a new treatment planning system in carbon ion radiotherapy, indicating significant dosimetric accuracy and efficiency.
BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) offers superior physical and biological advantages over photon and proton radiotherapy (PRT). However, due to a need for accurate modeling of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE), currently available treatment planning systems (TPS) for CIRT remain limited. This has constrained clinical and research applications by compelling reliance on a narrow set of systems and restricting flexibility for broader application. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop and validate a new efficient and accurate CIRT TPS for pencil-beam scanning (PBS)-based CIRT, tailored for the Heavy-Ion Therapy Center (HITC) at Yonsei Cancer Center (YCC), incorporating modified microdosimetric kinetic model (mMKM)-based RBE-weighted dose calculation and spot weight optimization. METHODS: matrices required for spot weight optimization with mMKM-based RBE-weighted dose calculation, which was further accelerated by Adam optimizer. Validation was performed by generating plans for a water phantom (10 Gy-RBE), a lung case (15 Gy-RBE), and a prostate case (4.3 Gy-RBE), using single-field and multi-field optimizations (MFO). The resulting plans were recalculated in RayStation (v.2025) and TOPAS MC, and compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) and gamma passing rate (GPR) at 2%/2 mm. RESULTS: The proposed TPS successfully automated the CIRT plan optimization within approximately 1 min for ∼1000 spots, which produced uniform RBE-weighted dose coverage in virtual water phantom, the lung patient, and the prostate patient cases. When the spot weights optimized by the proposed framework were recalculated using a commercial TPS and TOPAS MC, the resulting dose distributions closely matched those of the proposed TPS. Quantitatively, GPRs exceeding 98% were achieved for both physical and RBE-weighted dose at the 2%/2 mm criterion, except for the prostate single-field case, which yielded a GPR of 97.37% for the physical dose, relative to TOPAS MC, and a GPR of 96.28% for the RBE-weighted dose, relative to RayStation. These findings confirmed strong agreement between the proposed TPS, MC simulations, and a commercial TPS. CONCLUSION: A new, fully automated in-house CIRT TPS was developed and validated, demonstrating high dosimetric accuracy and computational efficiency, even comparable to a commercial TPS and MC simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: