This study develops a treatment planning system for ultra-high dose rate x-ray therapy, comparing it with conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy, indicating potential advantages.
Objective. To develop and validate a treatment planning system (TPS) for a novel x-ray ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) system and compare its performance with conventional volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Approach. A TPS was developed for a novel x-ray UHDR system featuring stationary beamlines and a Scanning Pencil-beam High-speed Intensity-modulated x-ray source (SPHINX). We studied an exemplary case using 16 beam angles, 1D scanning perpendicular to the bore axis, and a linear accelerator operating at 12 MeV electron energy with 1 mA average beam current. Treatment plans were generated using various system configurations and compared with clinical VMAT plans for lung (PTV: 239 cm^3), brain (PTV: 372 cm^3), and head-and-neck (PTV: 55 cm^3) cases. Configurations included different beamlet widths for lung cancer, coplanar and conical beam arrangements for brain cancer, and different beamlet spacings for head-and-neck cancer. Dose distributions in terms of target conformity and homogeneity indices, local dose rates (LDR), local irradiation time (LIT), and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing were compared. A validation workflow combining Monte Carlo simulations with TPS-generated treatment parameters was developed and tested on a lung case to ensure TPS dose calculation accuracy. Main results. TPS-generated plans achieved comparable target coverage to VMAT while delivering significantly higher dose rates (>12.5 Gy/s vs. 0.03 Gy/s) and ultra-short LITs. However, UHDR plans in general showed increased OAR mean doses. Conical beam arrangements in the brain case yielded higher maximum LDRs at isocenter of up to 49 Gy/s with LITs as low as 37 ms, but increased integral dose. The head-and-neck case demonstrated high LDRs (62 Gy/s to 98% of PTV) within 20 ms, with minimal differences between beamlet spacing configurations. The lung case validation workflow demonstrated >98% 3D gamma-index pass rate using 3%/3 mm threshold, confirming plan accuracy. Significance. The developed UHDR-TPS enables treatment planning for a novel x-ray UHDR system. In this preliminary study, it achieved plan quality comparable to VMAT for the specific lung, brain, and head-and-neck cancer cases studied, while delivering significantly higher dose rates and shorter irradiation times. Further optimization of the UHDR delivery with x-rays is needed, however, to decrease OAR doses and validate these initial findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: