Investigates joint scatter correction in photon-counting CT, suggesting efficiency improvements with deep learning.
BACKGROUND: The presence of scatter in computed tomography degrades image quality, and can be caused by the patient and by other components in the beam path, such as the bowtie filter. While conventional energy-integrating detectors do not provide spectral distinction, photon-counting (PC) detectors are energy-selective and provide spectral information about the incoming X-ray photons. Since each energy threshold is affected differently by scatter, this spectral information implicitly encodes the scatter content of a projection. PURPOSE: The purpose of this work is to investigate how the spectral information can be exploited to improve deep learning (DL)-based scatter correction. Furthermore, the performance of joint and separate patient and bowtie scatter correction will be investigated, addressing that bowtie scatter has not been considered in current DL-based approaches. METHODS: We present a DL-based approach that can estimate bowtie and patient scatter jointly and compare it against a separate correction. We also introduce neural network-based methods that incorporate the spectral information inherent in PCCT for scatter correction. We present networks that estimate scatter for up to four energy thresholds simultaneously. Training and validation was performed with Monte Carlo data as well as with real data measured by a clinical PCCT system. RESULTS: 1 HU at 70 keV, and from 5 HU to under 1 HU at 100 keV. CONCLUSIONS: This paper presents a combined method for correcting patient and bowtie scatter that delivers results equivalent to separate corrections and thus eliminates the need for multiple networks. Further, we demonstrate that deep scatter estimation can effectively exploit the spectral information available to improve scatter correction, especially for spectral applications, like VMIs. Spectral DSE networks slightly outperformed non-spectral variants, with multiple energy thresholds lead to more accurate estimations. This enables the use of one network for scatter correction and eliminates the need for multiple ones, thereby saving computational cost and complexity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennemann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: