Cross-sectional analysis reveals how different communication methods affect loneliness in older adults, suggesting tailored approaches.
Background: This study examined how the frequency of in-person, telephone, text-based communication, and video interactions with non-cohabiting family and friends relates to loneliness among older adults in Japan. Methods: We analyzed data from 6,786 adults aged ≥65 in the 2024 JACSIS study. Interaction frequency with non-cohabiting family and friends was categorized into none (reference), monthly, and weekly or more. Loneliness was measured using the 3-item UCLA Loneliness Scale and dichotomized at ≥4, indicating loneliness; a ≥7 cut-off was used in sensitivity analyses. Logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health-related factors. Results: For family, significant associations with lower loneliness were observed only at weekly frequencies (in-person: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.764, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.664-0.879; text: aOR 0.747, 95% CI 0.659-0.846; telephone: aOR 0.624, 95% CI 0.543-0.718), whereas for friends, significant associations were observed at monthly frequencies (in-person: aOR 0.621, 95% CI 0.549-0.701; text: aOR 0.881, 95% CI 0.778-0.997; telephone: aOR 0.734, 95% CI 0.659-0.819). Video calls were associated with lower odds of severe loneliness (score ≥7) in sensitivity analyses (weekly calls with family: aOR 0.736, 95% CI 0.547-0.991; monthly calls with friends: aOR 0.656, 95% CI 0.470-0.917). Conclusions: Interactions with friends show associations with lower levels of loneliness at lower frequencies than family contact. While text and phone calls are broadly associated with reduced loneliness, video calls demonstrate a notable link specifically with a lower prevalence of severe loneliness, underscoring the potential for tailored communication strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koizumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: