Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved domain adaptation in scenarios with additional features, suggesting enhanced predictive accuracy.
In many domain adaptation tasks, the source and target domains share an identical feature space, so the domain gap arises only from the distributional shift. In practice; however, new-target-only features (e.g., sensors added after training) often become available at test time, violating the shared feature space assumption and invalidating most existing methods. We address this setting with Label-Aware and Graph-Based Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Optimal Transport (LAGB-FGW), focusing on a transductive domain adaptation scenario, in which the entire unlabeled target data set is available during training, and predictions are jointly inferred for all target samples. LAGB-FGW (1) embeds label discrepancy directly into the source metric, (2) constructs a K-NN graph on the full target feature space to capture structure introduced by the additional features, and (3) jointly solves standard Optimal Transport (OT) and Gromov-Wasserstein OT, thereby transferring labels using both the common and the additional features. We validate LAGB-FGW on four synthetic benchmarks and the HAR70+ human-activity data set, and LAGB-FGW consistently outperforms all baselines, highlighting the advantage of combining source label information with graph-based structural cues when additional target features are available only at test time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aritake et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: