Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the role of apertures in optimizing dose conformity in proton FLASH radiotherapy, indicating beneficial outcomes for tumor targeting.
BACKGROUND: Proton single-energy Bragg peak (SEBP) FLASH delivery can achieve dosimetric distributions equivalent to conventional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). However, range-pulling and field compensator devices enlarge the proton pencil beam spot size, increasing lateral penumbra and compromising dose conformality and high-dose-rate distribution. Apertures are employed to mitigate these effects, enhancing dose metrics while preserving ultra-high dose rate performance. PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of apertures in sharpening lateral dose falloff and enhancing dose conformity in proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak (BP) FLASH radiotherapy (RT), addressing increased lateral dose spillage caused by universal range shifter (URS) and range compensator (RC) usage. METHODS: ) performance. RESULTS: Use of aperture significantly reduced lateral penumbra across all spatial positions. The degree of penumbra reduction increased significantly with the increased pullback, and the reduction effect at the BP was generally comparable to that at the entrance. The 5 cm field generally showed greater penumbra reduction than the 3 cm field. In the rGBM case, apertures improved gross tumor volume (GTV) dose conformity and reduced organ-at-risk (OAR) exposure but decreased ultra-high dose rate coverage for both GTV and OARs. The ultra-high dose rate coverage of GTV was not affected by the dose threshold, while the ultra-high dose rate coverage of the brain increased with the increasing dose threshold. CONCLUSION: Apertures effectively reduce lateral penumbra and dose spalliage to OARs, improving target dose conformity in range shifter-based SEBP FLASH-RT. They also can reduce ultra-high dose-rate exposure to critical OARs in the low-dose region while maintaining the FLASH ratio in the high-dose region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: