Qualitative study explores health inequalities in stroke rehabilitation, indicating urgent needs for equitable solutions.
PURPOSE: Disparities in stroke incidence, outcomes and access to healthcare are increasingly reported-including in relation coastal status-yet a health-systems perspective is rarely applied to examine root causes. This study utilises a health-systems approach to explore how rehabilitation models of care may exacerbate or mitigate health inequalities, in an organisation serving rural and coastal communities in England. METHODS: operationalisation of the theoretical framework. RESULTS: Rehabilitation systems exacerbated health inequalities, which was related to unresponsiveness to personal and social determinants, geographical factors and system-level factors. Bottlenecks were identified in accessibility and effective health coverage, which were associated with multiple aspects of a health system, including service delivery, financing, workforce, health information systems and leadership/governance. Four recurrent intersectional high‑risk profiles emerged. CONCLUSION: There are significant, system-derived challenges in the current stroke rehabilitation and life-after-stroke provision in the region studied, which may exacerbate health inequalities for those who are already marginalised by society. Applying an intersectional framework to develop solutions for equality in rehabilitation systems is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chadd et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: