PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 20266 citationsOpen Access

A Letter to an Atheist

View Full Paper
OGOscar Gaitan

Key Points

  • The central aim is to argue against the adequacy of an infinite regress in explaining existence, proposing a necessary being instead.
  • Developed a philosophical argument based on classical theist tradition
  • Examined concepts of divine simplicity and timelessness
  • Analyzed the limits of empirical methods for metaphysical inquiries
  • Argued that a necessary ground of being provides a more coherent explanation than a purely contingent universe
  • Contended that divine hiddenness is a critical aspect of understanding existence and metaphysics
  • Critiqued the limitations of empirical methods in addressing questions of ultimate reality

Abstract

This essay develops a concise philosophical argument concerning contingency, explanatory termination, necessary being, and divine hiddenness. It argues that an infinite regress of existentially dependent realities does not adequately account for existence and that a necessary ground of being offers a more coherent explanatory terminus than a brute contingent universe. Drawing on the classical theist tradition, the essay further examines divine simplicity, timelessness, and the limits of empirical methods in addressing metaphysical questions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Oscar Gaitan (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f44464967e944ac55674f7https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19870600
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper