Measures anti-nephrin antibodies in patients with podocytopathies, suggesting low disease-specificity.
BACKGROUND: Anti-nephrin autoantibodies have emerged as a putative pathogenic driver in a subset of patients with podocytopathies, including those with post-transplant disease recurrence. METHODS: We measured anti-nephrin autoantibodies in a cohort of 65 patients with podocytopathy associated with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (n = 39) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (n = 26), and in 34 patients with post-transplant podocytopathy recurrence. Fourteen patients with membranous nephropathy and 20 healthy volunteers served as controls. ELISA and immunoprecipitation assays were performed to detect anti-nephrin IgG using two different recombinant human nephrin proteins. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed to assess the deposition of IgG and their colocalization with nephrin in renal biopsies. RESULTS: When using murine antigen-based ELISA, the highest positivity was found in healthy volunteers (55%), correlating with levels of circulating natural anti-α-galactose-α-1,3-galactose antibodies. This cross-reactivity was abrogated with recombinant human nephrin expressed in human cells. In this setting, very low prevalence (<5%) of anti-nephrin antibody-positive patients was found in steroid-sensitive and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome cohorts and in patients with post-transplant disease recurrence. These frequencies were comparable to healthy volunteers. Using confocal and super-resolution microscopy, only trace amounts of IgM, but no IgG, were found in the glomeruli of analyzed biopsies, which did not colocalize with nephrin. CONCLUSIONS: With the methodology presented here, anti-nephrin reactivity was extremely rare and occurred at comparably low frequencies in healthy controls, native-kidney podocytopathies, and post-transplant disease recurrence. This suggests that these autoantibodies are not inherently disease-specific and may not serve as a broad biomarker across podocytopathies. CLINICALTRIALS: gov NCT06334692. FUNDING: Private donation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pecoraro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: