Evaluates the impact of textbook outcome in gastric cancer patients, indicating key risk factors for improvement.
BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the clinical impact of textbook outcome (TO) in patients with stage I gastric cancer (GC) who underwent minimally invasive surgery (MIS). Moreover, we identified the risk factors associated with achieving TO in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were selected from the database of the Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital between 2005 and 2025. Our definition of TO comprised 10 items: complete (potentially curative) resection, R0 resection, retrieval of more than 16 lymph nodes, no intraoperative complications, no severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher), no reintervention after surgery, no unplanned ICU/HCU admission, no readmission within 30 days after discharge, no prolonged hospital stay (defined as more than 21 days after surgery), and no mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: =0.041). CONCLUSION: The TO achievement rate was approximately 70%, and failure to achieve TO was associated with age, preoperative BMI, and type of gastrectomy. Achievement of TO was associated not only with favorable short-term outcomes but also with improved long-term oncological outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aoyama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: