Why the study?
Does a digital three-dimensional color Doppler flow method accurately quantify flow volume in an in vitro model compared to standard reference measurements?
Does a digital three-dimensional color Doppler flow method accurately quantify flow volume in an in vitro model compared to standard reference measurements?
A novel digital 3D color Doppler method accurately quantifies flow volume in an in vitro model, demonstrating feasibility for future in vivo evaluation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports in vitro feasibility of 3D Doppler flow quantification; leaves open in vivo validation and clinical translation.
OBJECTIVE: The quantification of flow stroke volume is important for evaluation of patients with cardiac dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. Three-dimensional digital color Doppler flow imaging allows the acquisition of flow data in an orientation approximately parallel to flow and analysis of the Doppler flow velocities perpendicular to flow (cross-sectional flow calculation). This in vitro study assessed the applicability of this method for quantifying cardiac output in a funnel-shaped tube model similar to mitral inflow or the left ventricular outflow tract. METHODS: A new digital three-dimensional color Doppler method was used to acquire Doppler flow information. Raw scan line data with digital velocity assignments were obtained on a conventional Doppler color flow imaging system with a 180 degrees rotating multiplanar transesophageal probe connected to a computer workstation. Nine stroke volumes (20-60 mL) with flow rates ranging from 1.5 to 5.28 L/min in a funnel-shaped pulsatile laminar flow model were studied. Three-dimensional flow rates were compared with standard-of-reference measurements of flow obtained from timed collection in a graduated cylinder and with an ultrasonic flow meter. RESULTS: Within the funnel tube, the flow volumes that were calculated from the first, second, and third depths and the average of all 3 depths correlated well with the actual flow rate (r = 0.97-0.99). Results from the middle and second levels and from the average of all 3 depths provided the closest fit to the actual flow rates (r = 0.99; y = 0.96x + 0.14; and r = 0.98; y = 1.14x - 0.43, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although a work in progress, this digital three-dimensional color Doppler flow measurement method is feasible, accurate, and simple, and it may offer in vivo evaluation of blood volume flow given a favorable orientation between the valve orifice and the scanning device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: