Why the study?
The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of telemonitoring over structured telephone support in reducing heart failure-related healthcare utilization.
Does telemonitoring-enhanced support reduce heart failure-related healthcare utilization in recently discharged heart failure patients compared to structured telephone support?
Does telemonitoring-enhanced support reduce heart failure-related healthcare utilization in recently discharged heart failure patients compared to structured telephone support?
Telemonitoring-enhanced support is associated with reduced healthcare utilization and costs compared to structured telephone support in recently discharged heart failure patients.
May support telemonitoring over telephone support in post-discharge HF; hypothesis-generating, requiring RCTs before practice change.
AIMS: Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of telemonitoring over structured telephone support in reducing heart failure-related healthcare utilization. METHODS: This was a non-randomised controlled study comparing 150 recently discharged heart failure patients enrolled into telemonitoring and 55 patients who only received structured telephone support after rejecting telemonitoring. Patient activation, knowledge and self-management levels were measured at baseline and the one year upon programme completion using the Patient Activation Measure, the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale and the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index respectively. Differences in heart failure-related and all-cause hospitalization rates, total bed days and mortality rates at 180 days and at one year, knowledge and self-management scores and total cost of care between groups at one year were analysed. RESULTS: = 0.07) in telemonitoring. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, telemonitoring was associated with lower all-cause and heart failure-related total bed days at 180 days, lower heart failure-related total bed days and total cost of care at one year as compared with structured telephone support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chow et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: