Cross-sectional study examines relationships between physical activity, sleep quality, and stress in university students, indicating gender differences in activity levels.
Objective To describe sleep quality, perceived stress, and physical activity levels, as well as to identify the associations between these variables in fourth-year Kinesiology students at the Catholic University of the Most Holy Conception . Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 29 fourth-year Kinesiology students (16 women, 13 men; aged 21–27 years) from a Chilean university. Physical activity was assessed using IPAQ-SF, sleep quality with the PSQI, and perceived stress with the PSS-14. Group comparisons were performed using Student's t-tests, Mann–Whitney U tests, or chi-square tests as appropriate, with corresponding effect sizes. A linear regression model was used to predict total physical activity from sex and perceived stress. Results Men reported significantly higher levels of vigorous ( p = 0.001) and total physical activity ( p = 0.001) compared to women, with medium-to-large effect sizes. Moderate-intensity activity was higher in men, but this difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.056). No significant sex differences were observed in total perceived stress or overall sleep quality. However, women scored higher on two individual PSS-14 items related to perceived lack of control and overload ( p = 0.013 and p = 0.036, respectively). In the regression analysis, sex was a significant predictor of total physical activity (B = −2005.96, standardized β = −0.499, p = 0.004), whereas perceived stress was negatively associated with activity but did not reach statistical significance (B = −69.76, standardized β = −0.267, p = 0.104). Conclusions Sex differences in physical activity were observed among Kinesiology students, with women reporting lower moderate-to-vigorous activity, while sleep was similar and two individual stress items differed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aguilera-Eguía et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: