PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 2, 20260 citations

Eukaryovorous Predation in Evolutionarily Significant Excavate-Like Flagellates.

View Full Paper
SSSei Suzuki‐TellierJCJames F CassEWE. J. Weston

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the functional ecology and predation strategies of deep-branching excavate-like flagellates.
  • Examined four species of deep-branching flagellates from Alveolata and Provora.
  • Analyzed their propulsion, hunting strategies, and feeding mechanisms in comparison to typical excavates.
  • Conducted simulations to assess the energetic efficiency of the vane-and-groove morphology.
  • Identified similarities in propulsion and hunting strategies between deep-branching flagellates and excavates.
  • Found that vane-and-groove morphology aids prey attachment but is energetically disadvantageous for propulsion.
  • Concluded that the overall role and evolutionary implications of the vane-and-groove structure remain uncertain and warrant further investigation.

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that the Last Eukaryotic Common Ancestor (LECA) resembled contemporary excavates, a non-monophyletic group of deep branching flagellates. Here we explore the functional ecology of distantly related deep-branching "excavate-like" flagellates (in Alveolata and Provora) that share with many excavates a vane-bearing posterior flagellum beating in association with a ventral groove. This arrangement is key to generating a feeding current in the bacterivorous typical excavates. However, the four species examined here are motile "hunters" that randomly encounter eukaryotic prey. Initial prey attachment may be facilitated by the force generated by the vaned flagellum but eventually by firing extrusomes. Propulsion is driven by the two flagella that are directed backwards. Despite minor differences, the propulsion and hunting strategies are similar between these two deep-branching groups and distinctly different from those found in typical excavates. While the vane-and-groove morphology may help prey attachment, simulations show that it seems energetically disadvantageous to propulsion. Thus, its overall role, origin, and phylogenetic implications remain unclear. This study adds to our knowledge of the functional ecological range of living vane- and groove-bearing flagellates. Given their significance to understanding early eukaryote evolutionary history, this may in turn shed light on the deep history of eukaryote life.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suzuki‐Tellier et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f593f271405d493affecf8https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.70084
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper