Discussion identifies ethical risks in scientific publishing, emphasizing originality and integrity in manuscripts.
In recent years, artificial intelligence has rapidly become one of the main actors in the process of producing and disseminating scientific knowledge. This transformation, alongside its remarkable opportunities, has also brought serious ethical and professional concerns for scientific editors and publishers. The JAMP journal is committed to keeping pace with global developments in scientific publishing and, while making informed use of new technologies, to safeguarding the fundamental principles of research ethics, transparency, and scientific integrity. As the editor-in-chief of this journal, I would like to discuss existing concerns regarding ethical challenges and risks, as well as methods of oversight—particularly originality and credibility of manuscripts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kojuri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: