Abstract The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), the rise of mega‐journals, and the manipulation of impact factors present challenges to scientific integrity. These trends threaten the core principles of objectivity, reproducibility, and transparency. This editorial highlights two categories of threats: (1) external pressures, such as AI misuse and metric‐driven publishing models, and (2) internal systemic flaws, including the ‘publish or perish’ culture and methodological fragility. Mega‐journals, characterized by high‐volume publishing and broad interdisciplinary scopes, improve accessibility and accelerate dissemination. However, the emphasis on publication volume might weaken the rigour of peer review. To navigate these challenges, the authors propose a balanced approach that harnesses innovation without compromising scientific integrity. Proposed solutions include mandating AI transparency through frameworks like Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials–Artificial Intelligence, and redefining impact metrics to emphasize reproducibility, mentorship, and societal impact alongside citations. Scientific journals should promote career opportunities less on publication quantity and more on quality. Global cooperation, via initiatives like the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment and the Committee on Publication Ethics, is essential to standardize ethics and address resource disparities. This editorial proposes solutions for researchers, journals, and policymakers to realign academic incentives and uphold the ethical foundation of science. By fostering transparency, accountability, and equity, the scientific community can preserve its ethical foundations while embracing transformative tools, ultimately advancing knowledge and serving society. Level of Evidence Level V.
Kayaalp et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: