Randomized trial examines L1 activation in bilinguals during L2 processing, indicating proficiency influences results.
PURPOSE: This study examined whether Chinese-English bilinguals activated orthographic and phonological representations from their first language (L1; Chinese) lexicon during second language (L2; English) processing, and how L2 proficiency modulated this process. METHOD: The current study involved 71 Chinese-English bilinguals: 40 with low L2 proficiency and 31 with high L2 proficiency. Using the visual-world paradigm, participants listened to an L2 word (e.g., "chair," Chinese translation: "" /yi3/) while viewing three images: a target, a competitor, and a distractor. In the orthographic condition, the competitor's Chinese name shared a radical with the Chinese translation of the English word (e.g., "" /qiao2/). In the phonological condition, the competitor's pronunciation matched that of the Chinese translation (e.g., "" /yi3/). The task was to click on the target image. RESULTS: Both low- and high-proficiency Chinese-English bilinguals exhibited significant competition effects in orthographic and phonological conditions, with higher fixation probability on phonological/orthographic competitors compared to distractors. The orthographic competition effect occurred earlier for low-proficiency bilinguals but later for high-proficiency bilinguals. Both groups showed an earlier phonological competition effect and high-proficiency bilinguals also exhibited a later phase of phonological activation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that Chinese-English bilinguals activate both orthographic and phonological representations from their L1 lexicon during L2 word processing. Although both low- and high-proficiency bilinguals showed nonselective cross-language coactivation, the timing of orthographic and phonological activation varied with L2 proficiency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: