Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective paired study compares bone graft shrinkage post-implant failure and evaluates replacement feasibility.
OBJECTIVES: This retrospective paired cohort study aimed to compare the three-dimensional volumetric shrinkage of endo-sinus bone graft between failed and surviving implants after one-stage lateral sinus floor elevation (LSFE), and to assess the feasibility of implant replacement without additional augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty failed implants were matched 1:1 with 20 surviving implants based on key clinical variables. Cone-beam computed tomography scans at five time points were analyzed to quantify graft volume and height changes. Surgical methods and clinical outcomes for implant replacement were also recorded. Paired t-test and repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare the radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: The shrinkage rate of endo-sinus bone grafts was statistically comparable between failed and surviving implants (32.54% ± 20.68% vs. 21.93% ± 10.54% at 1-year follow-up, p > 0.05). Residual bone graft reached adequate height to support replaced implants. Most failed sites were successfully restored with direct implant replacement, and reinserted implants achieved a 90% survival rate over a mean follow-up of 45 months. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that implant failure after LSFE does not necessarily correlate with accelerated resorption of bone graft, supporting the feasibility of direct implant replacement without further grafting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: