Retrospective cohort study shows increased laryngeal dysfunction incidence in COVID-19 patients, highlighting key risk factors.
OBJECTIVE(S): Long COVID affects multiple organ systems, yet the incidence and risk factors for post-COVID-19 laryngeal dysfunction remain underexplored. This study evaluated the incidence of laryngeal dysfunction following COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the TriNetX Global Collaborative EHR Network (> 180 million records). Adults without prior laryngeal dysfunction or major comorbidities were stratified by COVID-19 exposure and compared with uninfected controls. Outcomes included chronic cough, dysphagia, voice disorders, vocal fold paralysis, and laryngeal spasm, assessed up to 5 years post-infection. After propensity score matching, odds ratios (OR) and risk differences (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: COVID-19 was associated with significantly increased odds of chronic cough (peak OR 7.12; RD 0.33%, p < 0.0001), dysphagia (peak OR 2.71; RD 0.36%, p < 0.0001), voice disorders (peak OR 3.25; RD 0.12%, p < 0.0001), vocal fold paralysis (peak OR 2.17; RD 0.01%, p < 0.0001), and laryngeal spasm (peak OR 2.79; RD 0.003%, p < 0.0001). Incidence peaked at 1-2 years for most outcomes and at 2-3 years for laryngeal spasm. Hospitalization and mechanical ventilation were associated with increased rates of dysphagia (HR 2.63; HR 5.26), voice disorders (HR 1.15; HR 4.45), and vocal cord paralysis (HR 2.09; HR 9.35), but reduced rates of chronic cough (HR 0.68; HR 0.45). Vaccinated patients showed higher rates of chronic cough (HR 1.36) and voice disorders (HR 1.22). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is associated with increased incidence of new-onset laryngeal dysfunction, most commonly peaking 1-2 years after infection and influenced by hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and vaccination status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loblundo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: