Explores biomarkers for diabetic retinopathy, identifying potential therapeutic targets.
BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) can significantly impair vision and lead to blindness. Vitamin D (VD) has been shown to enhance the production of anti-inflammatory factors, alleviating the effects of hyperglycemia. However, downstream genes and molecular networks associated with VD signaling in DR remain unidentified. This study aimed to employ a systems biology approach to nominate high-priority candidate genes and cellular contexts as a hypothesis-generating effort to facilitate future functional studies on the role of VD in DR. METHODS: DR-related datasets were obtained from public databases to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Seven canonical VD metabolism-related genes (VDRGs) were subjected to weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify VD signaling-associated model genes. Candidate genes were selected based on the intersection of DEGs and model genes. "Boruta" and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE), along with expression validation, were used to screen for biomarkers. Further analyses included immune infiltration, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), regulatory network construction, and drug prediction. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) was utilized to assess cellular heterogeneity, identifying distinct cell clusters and key cells based on gene expression profiles. Cell-cell communication within immune cells was also examined. Biomarker expression levels in clinical samples were validated through real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). RESULTS: The biomarkers SLC36A1 and RAB23 were identified as VD signaling-associated downstream candidates and validated. GSEA revealed their primary association with glucose metabolism. B cells and CD4 T cells were identified as differentially expressed immune cells. Both biomarkers were regulated by a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network, and the drug "methyl methanesulfonate" targeted both biomarkers simultaneously. Single-cell analysis identified 11 distinct cell types, including classical monocytes, B cells, and T cells. B cells and classical monocytes were identified as key cells due to the differential expression of biomarkers. The cell-cell communication network highlighted interactions, particularly between classical monocytes, B cells, and T cells. The differentiation of key cells and the stage of biomarker expression were also uncovered. RT-qPCR analysis revealed a significant upregulation of SLC36A1 and RAB23 in the DR group compared to controls (F = 5.184 p = 0.027 < 0.05; F = 4.147 p = 0.047 < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SLC36A1 and RAB23 were identified as VD signaling-associated downstream biomarkers in DR, providing a framework for exploring the potential link between VD signaling and DR pathogenesis through these candidate genes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: