Key result
Work and social factors are associated with ~71% of gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation decisions.
Why the study?
Cardiac rehabilitation participation rates are unsatisfactory and exhibit significant gender disparities, leaving gender-specific determinants of participation decisions among CHD patients unclear.
What are the gender-specific determinants and barriers influencing the decision to participate in cardiac rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease?
Cross-Sectional (n=264)
Yes
What are the gender-specific determinants and barriers influencing the decision to participate in cardiac rehabilitation among patients with coronary heart disease?
Gender-specific interventions are needed to improve cardiac rehabilitation participation, addressing women's social role barriers and men's emergency risk concerns.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hypothesis-generating for gender-specific CR programs targeting social barriers; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
AIM: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is an effective intervention for improving outcomes in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). However, the actual participation rate is unsatisfactory and exhibits significant gender disparities. This study aimed to investigate gender-specific determinants of the decision to participate in CR among patients with CHD, together with underlying causes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 264 patients with CHD from 3 Chinese tertiary hospitals between February 2024 and February 2025. Data were collected using questionnaires based on the Information Need in Cardiac Rehabilitation scale, the Chinese version of Cardiac Rehabilitation Barriers Scale, the Family APGAR index questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form. Logistic regression analysis for men indicated that the facilitators of the decision to participate in CR were the level of family functioning and ≥ 2 comorbidities. The barriers included emergency/safety information needs and functional status. For women, the facilitators were retirement, family functioning level, being overweight/obesity, ≥ 2 comorbidities, and work/vocational/social factors. The barriers included medication information needs, logistical factors, and functional status. Fairlie decomposition revealed gender differences primarily driven by work/vocational/social factors (contribution: 71.19%), functional status (50.50%), and retirement (-39.16%) (all p < 0.05). IMPACT: This study highlights the necessity of gender-specific interventions during the decision-making phase for CR. Healthcare professionals should tailor CR strategies to address women's social role barriers and men's emergency risk concerns, while enhancing family functioning and targeting support for functional status and work-related factors. REPORTING METHOD: STROBE checklist, cross-sectional. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Three tertiary hospitals assisted in participant recruitment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Coronary heart disease (CHD) (n=264). Determinants of cardiac rehabilitation participation vs. Gender comparison (men vs women) was evaluated on Gender-specific determinants of the decision to participate in cardiac rehabilitation (p=<0.05). Gender differences in cardiac rehabilitation participation decisions were primarily driven by work/vocational/social factors, functional status, and retirement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: