Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In vitro study compares surface smoothness in additively manufactured zirconia, indicating effective polishing techniques.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Whether additively manufactured zirconia produced by stereolithography (SLA) or digital light processing (DLP) techniques can be polished effectively to achieve surface smoothness comparable with that of milled zirconia is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the surface roughness and topography of 2 additively manufactured zirconia materials fabricated via DLP and SLA with conventionally milled zirconia after a common zirconia finishing and polishing technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ) was measured at 4 stages: as-sintered, ground, ground and polished, and polished. Grinding and polishing were performed using a standard zirconia polishing system. Surface morphology and roughness were characterized, followed by 2-way ANOVA and pairwise comparisons (α=.05). RESULTS: values below 0.2 µm, the threshold for plaque accumulation. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed the elimination of grinding grooves and comparable smoothness among groups after polishing. CONCLUSIONS: The tested additively manufactured zirconia produced by DLP and SLA achieved smoother as-sintered surfaces than milled zirconia. Polishing effectively reduced surface roughness below the clinical threshold, demonstrating that the additively manufactured zirconia could meet surface quality standards for long-term intraoral performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bibera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: