Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study evaluates impact of glycemic control on retinal healing in patients with central retinal vein occlusion, indicating better control may improve outcomes.
Purpose To evaluate the association between suboptimal glycemic control and central macular thickness in central retinal vein occlusion patients over a 1-year follow-up period. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with central retinal vein occlusion diagnosed at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, with HbA1c levels measured within 6 months before or at diagnosis. Patients were divided into two groups: those with good (≤42 mmol/mol) and poor glycemic control (>42 mmol/mol). Central macular thickness and best-corrected visual acuity were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 1 year. Results Among 40 patients, 10 had suboptimal glycemic control. At 3 months and 1 year, central macular thickness was significantly higher in the poor glycemic control group compared with the good glycemic control group (367.0 ± 43.3 µm vs. 288.2 ± 36.6 µm, p = 0.016 and 380.8 ± 44.8 µm vs. 302.0 ± 71.3 µm, p = 0.035, respectively). HbA1c levels correlated with central macular thickness at 3 months (R2 = 0.514, p = 0.045) but did not reach statistical significance at 1 year (R2 = 0.246, p = 0.071). Conclusions Poor glycemic control in patients with central retinal vein occlusion is associated with greater central macular thickness at both 3 months and 1 year. These findings emphasize the importance of optimal glycemic control to improve retinal outcomes in central retinal vein occlusion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gushansky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: