PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 1, 1987Circulation Research152 citationsOpen Access

Protective effect of vagal stimulation on reperfusion arrhythmias in cats.

View Full Paper
GZGiulio ZuanettiGFGaetano Maria De FerrariSPSilvia G. Priori

Structured PICO

Does vagal stimulation reduce reperfusion arrhythmias in a feline model of myocardial ischemia-reperfusion?

P
Population
105 alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats subjected to 20 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion followed by reperfusion.
I
Intervention
Vagal stimulation (adjusted to maintain heart rate at 90-100 beats/min) or vagal stimulation + ventricular pacing (to maintain heart rate at prestimulation values).
C
Comparator
Neurally intact animals and animals with acute bilateral vagotomy.
O
Outcome
Incidence and severity of reperfusion arrhythmias (including ventricular fibrillation and sustained ventricular tachycardia).surrogate

Vagal stimulation provides protective effects against reperfusion arrhythmias, with reduction in ventricular fibrillation dependent on heart rate slowing, while protection against sustained ventricular tachycardia is independent of heart rate.

Abstract

The role of the autonomic nervous system in modulating reperfusion arrhythmias is still unclear. Experiments with sympathetic denervation or alpha- and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have provided mixed results, while the effect of parasympathetic activation has not been investigated extensively. The effect of bilateral vagotomy and of vagal stimulation was studied, with and without attendant bradycardia, on the incidence of reperfusion arrhythmias in alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded for 20 minutes, followed by reperfusion in 105 animals. The incidence and severity of reperfusion arrhythmias was compared in 1) neurally intact animals (heart rate 208 +/- 24 beats/min), 2) animals with acute bilateral vagotomy (heart rate 233 +/- 25 beats/min), 3) animals with vagal stimulation adjusted to maintain heart rate at 90-100 beats/min, and 4) animals with vagal stimulation + ventricular pacing to maintain heart rate at prestimulation values. All the neurally intact and vagotomized animals developed complex reperfusion arrhythmias, but these arrhythmias occurred in only 60 and 72%, respectively, of the animals with vagal stimulation and vagal stimulation + pacing (p less than 0.005 vs. neurally intact and p less than 0.02 vs. vagotomy). The incidence of ventricular fibrillation was similar in neurally intact (62%) and vagotomized (58%) animals; it was strikingly lower (7%, p less than 0.01) in animals with vagal stimulation when heart rate was allowed to decrease, and it was 48% when heart rate was kept constant during vagal stimulation. A selective protection from sustained (greater than 30 seconds duration) ventricular tachycardia was observed in animals with vagal stimulation independent of heart rate changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zuanetti et al. (1987) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f69177e405cc4465bc2b94https://doi.org/10.1161/01.res.61.3.429
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper