Why the study?
In acute heart failure, the consequences of impaired left atrial mechanics are not well understood.
Does left atrial strain analysis predict re-hospitalization and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
Does left atrial strain analysis predict re-hospitalization and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with acute heart failure?
Left atrial strain dynamics, particularly lack of improvement at 12 months, strongly predict re-hospitalization and cardiovascular outcomes in acute heart failure patients across all LVEF spectrums.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid risk stratification with LAS >16% in acute HF; leaves open whether strain monitoring improves outcomes.
AIMS: In acute heart failure (AHF), the consequences of impaired left atrial (LA) mechanics are not well understood. We aimed to define the clinical trajectory of LA mechanics by left atrial strain (LAS) analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty-five consecutive AHF patients with reduced, mildly reduced, and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were enrolled in the LAS-AHF trial and underwent LA mechanics analysis by speckle tracking echocardiography. Seventy-seven patients were followed-up (FU) at 6 and 12 months. At hospital admission, discharge, 6 and 12 months post-discharge, LA reservoir function (LAS), LA pump strain, LAVi, LA stiffness, indicators of right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function, congestion indexes (B lines, inferior vena cava, X-ray congestion score index), and biomarkers (NT-pro-BNP) were measured. The primary outcome was time to first event of re-hospitalization, worsening HF, or cardiovascular death. From admission to discharge, RV function significantly improved after decongestion, whereas no significant differences were observed in LA dynamics and LV function. In sinus rhythm patients with mild or no mitral regurgitation, decongestion was associated with a significant improvement of LAS and LA pump strain rate during hospitalization. At 12 months, 24 CV events occurred and lack of LAS improvement at 12 months FU emerged as the most powerful predictor followed by NT-pro-BNP. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a better survival for LAS >16%, improvement of LAS > 5%, and an LAS/LAVi ratio >0.25%/mL/m2 compared with lower cut-off values [log-rank: heart rate (HR) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8-7.3, P = 0.004; log-rank: HR 3.6, 95% CI 2-7.9, P < 0.01; log-rank: HR 3.27, 95% CI 1.4-7.7, P = 0.007]. CONCLUSION: In AHF of any LVEF, LA dynamics is highly predictive of re-hospitalization and cardiovascular outcome and allows to ease risk-stratification, potentially becoming an early reference target for improving long-term outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barki et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: