Does P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment reduce periprocedural myocardial infarction or increase bleeding in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI?
P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment in NSTEMI patients undergoing PCI does not reduce periprocedural MI but significantly increases the risk of in-hospital bleeding.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: inhibitor pretreatment on the incidence of periprocedural (type 4a) myocardial infarction (MI) and in-hospital bleeding in NSTEMI patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: inhibitor administration did not comply with contemporaneous ESC recommendations were excluded. The analysis compared patients treated before and after the 2020 ESC recommendation against routine pretreatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was type 4a MI, and the primary safety endpoint was in-hospital bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2, 3, and 5. RESULTS: A total of 1254 patients were included, of whom 740 (59.0%) received pretreatment, mainly with clopidogrel (91.2%). Type 4a MI occurred in 15.2% of patients, with no significant difference between the pretreatment and no pretreatment groups (15.9% vs 14.2%; aOR, 1.08; P=.638). In contrast, in-hospital bleeding was significantly higher in the pretreatment group (7.7% vs 3.9%; aOR, 2.17; P=.005), mainly due to BARC type 2 events. CONCLUSIONS: inhibitors, mainly clopidogrel, did not reduce the incidence of type 4a MI but was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital bleeding.
Armillotta et al. (Mon,) studied this question.