Key result
Obstructive CAD on 64-slice CT is linked to ~10-fold higher MACE risk.
Why the study?
Does 64-slice computed tomography predict major adverse cardiac events in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=227)
Does 64-slice computed tomography predict major adverse cardiac events in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
64-slice computed tomography provides significant incremental prognostic information for predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients with suspected but no documented coronary artery disease.
AIMS: Although multislice computed tomography (MSCT) detects obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) with high diagnostic accuracy, there is a paucity of long-term prognostic data. We sought to assess the incremental prognostic value of 64-slice CT in patients with suspected but no documented CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary MSCT was performed on 227 individuals (61% men, mean age 54 +/- 12 years, 63% with intermediate pre-test probability) without documented CAD, referred for coronary evaluation. Coronary artery disease by MSCT was categorized as follows: none or mild CAD (<50%, n = 172), > or =50% in one vessel (n = 23), two vessels [or in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD), n = 12], and three vessels (or in two vessels including the proximal LAD or left main, n = 20). Baseline risk factors, length of follow-up, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary revascularization were recorded. Over a mean follow-up of 2.3 +/- 0.8 years, there were 18 MACE [including four hard events (one cardiac death and three MIs)]. Also, patients with one or more vessel obstructive CAD had increased hard events compared with those with less than one-vessel disease (log-rank statistic P-value 0.01). One or more vessel obstructive CAD was a significant predictor of MACE on univariable and multivariable Cox proportional survival analysis [hazard ratios 29.1 (6.7-126.6) and 9.82 (3.58-27.01), respectively, both P < 0.0001]. In 172 patients, with no or mild CAD, there was 99% freedom from MACE during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Multislice computed tomography-classified extent of CAD provides incremental prognostic information in patients with suspected but no documented CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carrigan et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Suspected but no documented coronary artery disease (n=227). One or more vessel obstructive CAD (≥50%) on 64-slice CT vs. No or mild CAD (<50%) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and coronary revascularization (HR 9.82, 95% CI 3.58-27.01, p=< 0.0001). Presence of one or more vessel obstructive CAD on 64-slice CT strongly predicted major adverse cardiac events compared to no or mild CAD (adjusted HR 9.82; 95% CI 3.58-27.01; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: