PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 3, 20261 citations

Dissociable systems for visually guided navigation versus reaching and grasping in human parietal cortex.

View Full Paper
HYHee Kyung YoonYJYaelan JungDDDaniel D. Dilks

Key Points

  • This research aims to determine whether the parietal cortex contains distinct regions for navigation compared to reaching and grasping actions.
  • Utilized functional MRI (fMRI) in adults to assess brain activity.
  • Participants viewed four stimulus types: dynamic scenes, static scenes, contextual reaching and grasping, and isolated reaching and grasping.
  • Analyzed resting-state functional connectivity to further investigate parietal cortex organization.
  • SPL exhibited significantly greater activation in response to dynamic scenes than to static scenes and both reaching and grasping conditions.
  • SPOC showed significantly higher activation in response to both reaching and grasping conditions compared to scene conditions.
  • Resting-state connectivity analysis revealed SPL’s stronger connection with leg-motor cortex and SPOC’s stronger connection with arm-motor cortex.

Abstract

Parietal cortex is thought to support visually guided actions, but whether it contains distinct regions specialized for different actions-such as navigation, reaching, and grasping-remains unknown. Prior work implicates the superior parietal lobule (SPL) in navigation and the superior parietal occipital cortex (SPOC) in reaching and grasping, yet whether these are truly dissociable is unclear. We addressed this using fMRI in adults. Participants viewed four stimulus types: Dynamic Scenes (first-person motion through scenes), Static Scenes (static images from these movies), Contextual Reaching and Grasping (first-person reaching and grasping on a scene background), and Isolated Reaching and Grasping (reaching and grasping actions on a black background). A double dissociation emerged: SPL responded significantly more to Dynamic than Static Scenes-consistent with its role in visually-guided navigation-and, critically, more to Dynamic Scenes than either reaching and grasping condition. By contrast, SPOC responded significantly more to both reaching and grasping conditions than to either scene condition. Resting-state functional connectivity further supported this double dissociation: SPL showed stronger connectivity with "leg-motor" than "arm-motor" cortex, whereas SPOC showed the opposite pattern. These findings reveal two distinct parietal systems: SPL for visually-guided navigation and SPOC for visually-guided reaching and grasping-clarifying how the parietal cortex organizes visually guided action.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f6e5ac8071d4f1bdfc6511https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag050
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Remapping Attentional Priorities: Differential Contribution of Superior Parietal Lobule and Intraparietal Sulcus2007 · 181 citations
  2. 2Representation of navigational affordances and ego-motion in the occipital place area2024
  3. 3Reciprocal interactions among parietal and occipito-temporal representations support everyday object-directed actions2024 · 17 citations
  4. 4Visual to default network pathways: A double dissociation between semantic and spatial cognition2024
  5. 5Visual to default network pathways: A double dissociation between semantic and spatial cognition2024